Engineering Calculator

Beam Load Calculator

Defined supports. Clear response.

Span. Stiffness. Load.

Choose supports, load placement and units.

Applied at midspan.

View results
Output units and station probe

Fraction of the span from the left end, from zero through one. The midpoint is one half.

Optional comparisons

Deflection comparisons and elastic bending stress are numerical outputs, not structural approval or material allowables.

Display options

Known span, modulus and second moment of area must be positive. Load magnitudes and target deflection may be zero. Use up to twenty significant input digits and exponents from negative thirty through thirty. Self-weight is included only when you add it to the supplied uniform intensity.

Worked examples

Maximum downward deflection

δmax⁡≈1.75781 mm\delta_{\max}\approx1.75781\,\mathrm{mm}

Prismatic, linear elastic, small-deflection beam response under the stated ideal supports and same-direction loads.

Simply supported: ideal left pin and right roller. One point load at midspan. All loads act downward. Constant stiffness, small deflections and a linear elastic prismatic beam are assumed. Shear deformation, self-weight, dynamics and stability are not added automatically.

Peak response and support reactions

Maximum downward deflection

δmax⁡≈1.75781 mm\delta_{\max}\approx1.75781\,\mathrm{mm}

Peak absolute bending moment

∣M∣max⁡=3.75000 kN m|M|_{\max}=3.75000\,\mathrm{kN}\,\mathrm{m}

Peak absolute internal shear

∣V∣max⁡=2.50000 kN|V|_{\max}=2.50000\,\mathrm{kN}

Peak absolute beam slope

∣v′∣max⁡≈0.00175781|v'|_{\max}\approx0.00175781

Left upward support reaction

RA=2.50000 kNR_A=2.50000\,\mathrm{kN}

Right upward support reaction

RB=2.50000 kNR_B=2.50000\,\mathrm{kN}

Maximum deflection position

xδ=1.50000 mx_{\delta}=1.50000\,\mathrm{m}

Relative maximum deflection

δmax⁡/L≈0.000585938\delta_{\max}/L\approx0.000585938

Span-to-deflection ratio

L/δmax⁡≈1706.67L/\delta_{\max}\approx1706.67

Peak deflection and bending-moment magnitude occur at midspan. Peak absolute shear and slope occur at the supports. A slope is the derivative of downward deflection with respect to span position, not a geometrically exact rotation angle.

Inputs and coherent SI record

Span length

L=3.00000 mL=3.00000\,\mathrm{m}

Elastic modulus

E=200.000 GPaE=200.000\,\mathrm{GPa}

Second moment of area

I=8000000 mm4I=8000000\,\mathrm{mm}^4

Applied point load

P=5.00000 kNP=5.00000\,\mathrm{kN}

Span in SI

L=3.00000 mL=3.00000\,\mathrm{m}

Elastic modulus in SI

E=2.00000×1011 PaE=2.00000\times10^{11}\,\mathrm{Pa}

Second moment of area in SI

I=8.00000×10−6 m4I=8.00000\times10^{-6}\,\mathrm{m}^4

Point load in SI

P=5000.00 NP=5000.00\,\mathrm{N}

Uniform intensity in SI

w=0 Nmw=0\,\frac{\mathrm{N}}{\mathrm{m}}

Flexural rigidity in SI

EI=1600000 N m2EI=1600000\,\mathrm{N}\,\mathrm{m}^2

Load model and response shapes

Simply supported beam — selected load model
Simply supported beam. The point load acts at midspan.

Internal shear shape

Internal shear shape — normalized response
Left endRight end
Positive shear is drawn above the baseline. The point-load jump is included; simple-support reaction jumps are omitted. Curves use forty-one span stations; their drawn vertical scales cannot be compared with one another.

Signed bending moment shape

Signed bending moment shape — normalized response
Left endRight end
Positive sagging moment is drawn above the baseline; cantilever hogging moment is negative. Curves use forty-one span stations; their drawn vertical scales cannot be compared with one another.

Downward deflection shape

Downward deflection shape — normalized response
Left endRight end
Positive downward deflection is drawn below the undeformed baseline. Vertical scale is exaggerated independently. Curves use forty-one span stations; their drawn vertical scales cannot be compared with one another.

Selected station response

Span fraction

x/L=0.500000x/L=0.500000

Position from the left end

x=1.50000 mx=1.50000\,\mathrm{m}

Shear before a point-load jump

V−=2.50000 kNV^{-}=2.50000\,\mathrm{kN}

Shear after a point-load jump

V+=−2.50000 kNV^{+}=-2.50000\,\mathrm{kN}

Signed bending moment

M=3.75000 kN mM=3.75000\,\mathrm{kN}\,\mathrm{m}

Downward deflection

v≈1.75781 mmv\approx1.75781\,\mathrm{mm}

Beam slope

v′=0v'=0

The coordinate starts at the left support or clamp. Shear limits differ at the concentrated load. For simple-beam endpoints both values are internal span-side values, excluding support reaction jumps; the cantilever tip-load jump to zero is included.

Step-by-step beam working

  1. 1. Declare supports and loading

    Ideal pin and roller supports, with a point load at midspan and/or a full-span uniform load. Both applied load magnitudes act downward.

    E>0,I>0,L>0,P≥0,w≥0E>0,\quad I>0,\quad L>0,\quad P\geq0,\quad w\geq0
  2. 2. Normalize stiffness and span

    Convert the span, elastic modulus and second moment of area to coherent SI. Fourth-power unit factors are applied to the second moment of area.

    L=3.00000 m,E=2.00000×1011 Pa,I=8.00000×10−6 m4L=3.00000\,\mathrm{m},\quad E=2.00000\times10^{11}\,\mathrm{Pa},\quad I=8.00000\times10^{-6}\,\mathrm{m}^4
  3. 3. Normalize active applied loads

    Inactive load components are zero in the model. A uniform load is force per length, not a total force.

    P=5000.00 N,w=0 NmP=5000.00\,\mathrm{N},\quad w=0\,\frac{\mathrm{N}}{\mathrm{m}}
  4. 4. Apply superposition to peak deflection

    For these same-direction load families, the exact maximum is at midspan for simple supports and at the free end for a cantilever. Zero load has no unique maximum location.

    δmax⁡=PL348EI+5wL4384EI≈1.75781 mm\delta_{\max}=\frac{PL^3}{48EI}+\frac{5wL^4}{384EI}\approx1.75781\,\mathrm{mm}
  5. 5. Recover reactions, shear and moment

    Shear is the derivative of sagging-positive bending moment. Cantilever internal bending moments are negative under these downward loads; the reported peak moment is an absolute magnitude.

    RA=RB=P+wL2=2.50000 kN,∣M∣max⁡=PL4+wL28=3.75000 kN mR_A=R_B=\frac{P+wL}{2}=2.50000\,\mathrm{kN},\quad |M|_{\max}=\frac{PL}{4}+\frac{wL^2}{8}=3.75000\,\mathrm{kN}\,\mathrm{m}
What Can You Create?

Build a traceable beam-response model

Compare six support and load cases

Inspect ideal simple supports or a left-fixed cantilever, with the prescribed point load, full-span uniform intensity or their same-direction combination.

Recover one load or inspect a station

Solve a pure load from a target deflection, or evaluate the response at any bounded span fraction. Retain both shear limits at a concentrated load.

Save complete numerical evidence

Keep exact peak results, reactions, optional comparisons and all forty-one computational stations. The visible sampled table is a summary rather than the extent of the saved data.

Beam load formulas and step-by-step examples

Declare the model and bending axis first

The beam is prismatic with constant elastic modulus EE, second moment of area II and span LL. Both load magnitudes are nonnegative and act downward: a concentrated force PP and full-span uniform intensity ww. Linear elastic Euler–Bernoulli bending assumes small deflections and neglects shear deformation. The flexural rigidity is EIEI; it is not determined by area alone.

E>0,I>0,L>0,P≥0,w≥0E>0,\qquad I>0,\qquad L>0,\qquad P\geq0,\qquad w\geq0

Simple supports are an ideal pin and roller at the span ends. A cantilever has a perfectly fixed left end and a free right end. The support choice changes the boundary conditions and coefficients substantially. Neither model includes finite support flexibility, a second span, a partial uniform load or an arbitrary point-load position. Self-weight is included only if it has already been added to the entered uniform intensity.

Use the matching peak-deflection formula

For the simple beam, the point force acts at midspan and the maximum downward deflection is also at midspan. For the cantilever, the point force is at the free end and the maximum is at that free end. Same-direction combinations can be added because the adopted model is linear and their deflection maxima coincide.

δmax⁡,simple=PL348EI+5wL4384EI\delta_{\max,\mathrm{simple}}=\frac{PL^3}{48EI}+\frac{5wL^4}{384EI}δmax⁡,cantilever=PL33EI+wL48EI\delta_{\max,\mathrm{cantilever}}=\frac{PL^3}{3EI}+\frac{wL^4}{8EI}

Set the inactive load component to zero for a pure load case. A distributed intensity contributes total force W=wLW=wL; substituting WW directly for ww would introduce the wrong dimensions. The calculator keeps force and force-per-length unit families separate and converts the fourth-power inertia factor before evaluating either expression.

Work the retained simply-supported point example

The original inputs are L=3 mL=3\,\mathrm{m}, P=5 kNP=5\,\mathrm{kN}, E=200 GPaE=200\,\mathrm{GPa} and I=8×106 mm4I=8\times10^6\,\mathrm{mm}^4, with no uniform component. First normalize the load, modulus and inertia. The fourth power matters: 1 mm4=10−12 m41\,\mathrm{mm}^4=10^{-12}\,\mathrm{m}^4.

P=5000 N,E=200×109 Pa,I=8×10−6 m4P=5000\,\mathrm{N},\quad E=200\times10^9\,\mathrm{Pa},\quad I=8\times10^{-6}\,\mathrm{m}^4δmax⁡=5000⋅3348⋅(200×109)⋅(8×10−6) m=1.7578125 mm\delta_{\max}=\frac{5000\cdot3^3}{48\cdot(200\times10^9)\cdot(8\times10^{-6})}\,\mathrm{m}=1.7578125\,\mathrm{mm}

The corresponding reactions are RA=RB=2.5 kNR_A=R_B=2.5\,\mathrm{kN} and the maximum sagging moment is 3.75 kN m3.75\,\mathrm{kN}\,\mathrm{m}. With a separate full-span intensity of w=2 kN/mw=2\,\mathrm{kN}/\mathrm{m}, its own peak deflection is 1.318359375 mm1.318359375\,\mathrm{mm}. Combining both downward loads gives 3.076171875 mm3.076171875\,\mathrm{mm}, with each simple support carrying 5.5 kN5.5\,\mathrm{kN}.

Separate internal moment from the support reaction couple

RA=RB=P+wL2,∣M∣max⁡,simple=PL4+wL28R_A=R_B=\frac{P+wL}{2},\qquad |M|_{\max,\mathrm{simple}}=\frac{PL}{4}+\frac{wL^2}{8}RA,cantilever=P+wL,CA=PL+wL22R_{A,\mathrm{cantilever}}=P+wL,\qquad C_A=PL+\frac{wL^2}{2}

For the cantilever, CAC_A is the external counterclockwise reaction-couple magnitude. Internal bending moment is sagging-positive, so the fixed-end internal moment under these downward loads is M(0)=−CAM(0)=-C_A. With both original load components active, the cantilever gives a free-end deflection of 40.78125 mm40.78125\,\mathrm{mm} and a reaction couple of 24 kN m24\,\mathrm{kN}\,\mathrm{m}. The free end is not a second support.

Read signed stations with the declared convention

The coordinate xx runs from the left support or clamp. Bending moment MM is positive for sagging, internal shear satisfies V=dM/dxV=dM/dx, and deflection vv is positive downward. Accordingly, the model’s curvature equation is EI v′′=−MEI\,v''=-M. The reported slope is v′v', a dimensionless derivative; treating it as a rotation angle is a small-slope approximation.

V(a+)−V(a−)=−PV(a^+)-V(a^-)=-P

At the simple-beam point-load location a=L/2a=L/2, the pure point example has shear limits V(a−)=2.5 kNV(a^-)=2.5\,\mathrm{kN} and V(a+)=−2.5 kNV(a^+)=-2.5\,\mathrm{kN}. Moment and deflection remain continuous. Simple-beam endpoint shear values are internal span-side values and exclude support reaction jumps. At a cantilever’s free-end point load, the reported shear jump to zero is included.

Invert one load without inventing a combined-load split

A specified nonnegative maximum deflection and positive stiffness determine one pure load for the selected support model. A single deflection cannot determine two independent load magnitudes. Inverse mode therefore offers pure point or uniform loading and does not present an arbitrary combined answer as unique.

Psimple=48EIδL3,wsimple=384EIδ5L4P_{\mathrm{simple}}=\frac{48EI\delta}{L^3},\qquad w_{\mathrm{simple}}=\frac{384EI\delta}{5L^4}Pcantilever=3EIδL3,wcantilever=8EIδL4P_{\mathrm{cantilever}}=\frac{3EI\delta}{L^3},\qquad w_{\mathrm{cantilever}}=\frac{8EI\delta}{L^4}

Using the original simple-beam stiffness with target δ=1.7578125 mm\delta=1.7578125\,\mathrm{mm} recovers P=5 kNP=5\,\mathrm{kN}. This is the load satisfying the adopted equation, not a rated capacity. A zero target yields a zero load and zero response; the maximum location is then not unique and L/δL/\delta is undefined.

Keep optional comparisons narrow

δlim=LN    or an adopted absolute allowance,D=δmax⁡δlim\delta_{\mathrm{lim}}=\frac{L}{N}\;\;\text{or an adopted absolute allowance},\qquad D=\frac{\delta_{\max}}{\delta_{\mathrm{lim}}}

You choose the positive divisor NN or a positive absolute allowance. For example, L=3 mL=3\,\mathrm{m} with an adopted divisor of 240240 gives an allowance of 12.5 mm12.5\,\mathrm{mm}. A calculated deflection equal to that allowance has D=1D=1. The comparison uses exact unrounded values and says only below, equal to or above the adopted limit; it does not select a code requirement or certify a beam.

S=Ic,∣σ∣max⁡=∣M∣max⁡cIS=\frac{I}{c},\qquad |\sigma|_{\max}=\frac{|M|_{\max}c}{I}

The optional extreme-fiber distance cc must match the same neutral axis as II. In the original point-load example, c=50 mmc=50\,\mathrm{mm} gives S=0.00016 m3S=0.00016\,\mathrm{m}^3 and a stress magnitude of 23.4375 MPa23.4375\,\mathrm{MPa}. That elastic magnitude is not a material allowable and does not check shear stress, lateral stability or local section behavior.

Why Users Love This Tool

Keep the case definition beside every result

Traceable numerical response

  • Exact rational arithmetic uses defined unit ratios before independent display rounding.
  • Maximum values come from matching closed-form equations, rather than estimating peaks from a coarse plot.
  • Signed station results preserve point-load shear jumps and cantilever hogging moment.
  • Copy and CSV include all computational stations, even when the sampled table or working is hidden.

Explicit interpretation limits

  • Support conditions, point location and uniform-load extent are stated with the result.
  • Zero stiffness is rejected and zero load is handled as a genuine zero-response model.
  • Adopted deflection allowances and extreme-fiber stress remain optional numerical checks.
  • The model does not silently add self-weight, nonlinear response, shear deformation, dynamics, material allowables or design approval.
Perfect For

For beam theory, worksheets and preliminary response checks

Students and instructors

Compare support conditions, inspect superposition and connect reactions with shear, moment and elastic response shapes.

Engineering note writers

Record units, load placement and idealizations so a numerical result can be reproduced without guessing which closed-form case was used.

Technical reviewers

Check a narrowly defined elastic model before considering additional design criteria, actual support stiffness or a more general structural analysis.

How It Works

How it works in three quick steps.

1

Choose supports, loading and the known quantities

Select a simply supported beam or a cantilever. The point load is at midspan for simple supports and at the free end for a cantilever. A uniform intensity always covers the full span. Use response mode for one or both known loads, or inverse mode for one pure load at a supplied target deflection.

2

Enter positive stiffness and compatible units

Supply a positive span, elastic modulus and second moment of area about the actual bending axis. Use nonnegative downward load magnitudes. Check force-per-length versus total-force units and fourth-power inertia factors. Optionally adopt a deflection allowance or supply an extreme-fiber distance for an elastic stress magnitude.

3

Review exact peaks, signed stations and model limitations

Inspect reactions, maximum deflection, moment and shear magnitudes, signed station values and normalized response plots. Check both sides of a point-load jump. Copy complete text or LaTeX, download all computational stations as CSV, share active settings or print the selected report. Optional comparisons do not establish structural approval.

Download & Print

Save or print the complete beam response

Copy text or LaTeX

Complete text retains the support model, input certificates, reactions, station units and every computed station. Copy LaTeX preserves the generated peak derivation.

Download CSV or share active settings

CSV includes all forty-one computational stations plus the selected probe. A strict versioned link reproduces active loads, units and enabled comparison settings.

Print or save a PDF

Use the report print control and the browser’s Save as PDF option. The selected plots, optional station table and visible working remain in the report while editing controls and this guide are excluded.

FAQ

Frequently Asked Questions

Which beam load cases are supported?
There are six forward cases: simply supported or cantilever supports, each with a prescribed point load, a full-span uniform load, or both acting downward in the same plane. The simple-beam point load is at midspan; the cantilever point load is at its free end. The calculator does not relocate that force automatically or apply these peak formulas to arbitrary off-center loading, partial distributed loads or opposing load directions.
What is the difference between a uniform intensity and a total load?
A uniform intensity is force per length, while a point load is a concentrated force. The total force of a full-span uniform load is its intensity multiplied by the span. Supplying a total force in an intensity field changes the physical problem. The tool retains separate unit families and shows the normalized intensity and point force in the report, including zero for an inactive component.
Can I find a load from a target deflection?
Yes. Inverse mode uses the exact maximum-deflection coefficient for one pure point load or one pure uniform intensity under the selected support condition. A nonnegative target produces the corresponding nonnegative numerical load. A deflection alone cannot determine how two unknown load magnitudes are split, so combined loading is unavailable in inverse mode. The answer satisfies the adopted elastic equation and is not an allowable design load.
Which second moment of area and modulus should I enter?
Use the second moment of area about the bending axis actually being analyzed, together with a compatible linear elastic modulus. Area moment of inertia has length raised to the fourth power and is different from ordinary cross-sectional area or mass moment of inertia. The calculator does not determine a section’s orientation, material grade or temperature-dependent stiffness from those numbers. Its original modulus is an adopted example rather than a verified material selection.
Why does shear have two values at a point load?
A concentrated downward force creates a jump in internal shear. The report preserves values immediately before and after that load rather than choosing one silently. At simple-beam endpoints the reported values are on the internal span side and omit support reaction jumps. A cantilever tip-load jump to zero is included. Away from a concentrated force, the two shear values coincide; bending moment and deflection remain continuous in these cases.
Do the plots show the actual deflected geometry?
The plots are response shapes with independently normalized vertical scales and an exaggerated deflection scale. They use forty-one equally spaced span stations, including the point-load location, and explicitly draw the shear jump. The same vertical distance on two plots does not mean equal physical magnitudes. Exact model peaks, signed probe values and complete station records provide the dimensional numerical information that a shape sketch alone cannot communicate.
Does meeting the adopted deflection limit mean the beam is safe?
No. The optional limit compares one calculated deflection with a positive numerical allowance that you adopt. It does not establish the appropriate code limit, load combination, allowable stress or support behavior. Strength, stability, buckling, fatigue, connections, bearing and other serviceability requirements need additional information and analysis. Equality is reported as a boundary comparison, and a below-limit result is deliberately not labeled structural approval.
What does the optional extreme-fiber stress represent?
It is an elastic bending-stress magnitude based on the peak moment magnitude, supplied extreme-fiber distance and second moment of area. Both geometric inputs must describe the same neutral axis and bending direction. The result does not find the neutral axis, identify a tension side for every section, choose a material allowable or check yielding. It also does not replace shear-stress, lateral stability or connection checks.
About This Tool

About this Beam Load Calculator

Toolarithm’s Beam Load Calculator is built around a stated support model and load placement rather than an unexplained deflection number. It retains the original simply-supported center-point example and extends the workflow to full-span uniform loading, their same-direction combination and equivalent cantilever cases. Each response is connected to its reactions, internal force conventions and elastic assumptions. The inverse workflow is deliberately limited to a single pure load because a target deflection alone cannot identify an arbitrary split between independent point and distributed loads.

The numerical engine evaluates entered decimals and defined unit ratios as reduced rational values. Unit normalization is therefore separate from final display rounding, including the fourth-power factors required by the second moment of area. Peak quantities use the appropriate closed-form expressions. The response plots provide normalized shapes, while the selected probe, sampled table and complete exported station records provide numerical detail and both shear limits at a concentrated force. The saved record keeps those conventions with the result instead of relying on the appearance of a sketch.

This model remains a small-deflection, linear elastic, prismatic-beam calculation with ideal supports. It does not identify a material, choose a section orientation, add self-weight from an unknown geometry or verify structural capacity. The optional deflection allowance is user-adopted, and the optional bending stress is an elastic magnitude based on supplied geometry. Code load combinations, support flexibility, stability, local effects, shear deformation and dynamic response require additional evidence or a more general analysis. The purpose of this page is to make the supported numerical cases reproducible with their practical limits visible.

Editorial Transparency

Who maintains this page

Ownership and review

Written and maintained by the Toolarithm editorial team. No review date is shown without a maintained editorial record. No independent professional review is claimed.

Methodology

Inputs, unit conversions, model assumptions, and scope limits are reviewed for preliminary educational use. No design certification or professional review is claimed.

Read the editorial methodology

Keep building

Explore more calculators

Calculators hub